A national identity
I've been having a few debates recently about independence, triggered
by the recent SNP victory in Scotland, and I'm still trying to
crystallise my views on the subject, so I'm going to take a few posts
to talk about how I feel, to get away from the political and economic
arguments, and think about the more personal arguments, so please chip
in with your thoughts. Today's post is inspired by David Mitchell mourning Britain and
discussing British Identity in the context of independence winning out
in a referendum (
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/15/david-mitchell-scotland-s...
). I know a lot of people I know on Facebook and Twitter feel the same
way, but I don't. I have Scottish parents, and 3 of my 4 grandparents
were born in Scotland. The other, having been born in Berwick Upon
Tweed, would give me entitlement to an English passport after
secession, but was unlikely to admit it. I was, however, born and raised in England, and my accent makes this
clear, but I always spent time visiting my extended family in
Scotland, read The Beano and The Sunday Post (Oor Wullie meant that,
years later, I found nothing difficult in the language of
Trainspotting), and I always supported the Scottish Rugby team, but
also supported Nigel Mansell and Richard Noble. My heroes include
James Watt, but also Alan Turing and Albert Einstein. I did feel that
when I moved to Edinburgh for university however, it did feel like a
homecoming, but then I must admit that I never quite felt like I
fitted in, in England, or in Scotlad. I never felt excluded, more like
a welcome traveller passing through. Partly because of these
allegiances and partly from a conscious decision that I always wanted
to keep my options open, looking out rather than in. So, my identity has always included Scottishness, but it also includes
Britishness, bound in the concepts of fair play, tolerance and
inclusiveness, and a European identity forged from Human Rights and
freedom that extends across borders. I am, too, a geek, a musician, an
athiest, a husband, a son, a brother, and in many other ways, part of
a family. I have many identities, and the legal status of this land at
one end of this group of islands will not change that. An independent
Scotland will not destroy Britain, or a British identity, but it will
further define it as a unique identity apart from an English identity.
The English identity, like the Scottish, Irish, and many other
national identities, is a tribal one, where different regions maintain
a separate identity but also share a common one. The conflict of the
English identity is that it is bound so tightly to the British
identity (and formally the Imperial identity), that it can be hard to
separate them. This is not a problem for Scotland, and this is not a problem for
Britain, it is not even a problem for England, despite fears to the
contrary. England will still be the home for the commonwealth head of
state, who will also remain Scotland's head of state according to the
SNP's proposal. England will still unite behind one football team, one
rugby team and one cricket team, but will also be a nation whose
people support other teams, permanently or temporarily. It is a
multi-cultural, globalised nation, at its best when it looks out to
the world with eyes that care about tolerance and fairness, those
British eyes that have readily embraced Indian cuisine, Japanese car
makers, American culture, and the best things from around the world. So where does this leave Scottish identity? Scottish identity cannot
be separated from a British identity, or a Celtic identity
(particularly in the West), a Viking identity (particularly in the
North East), or a European identity. It is also impossible to define
the modern Scottish identity without talking about the neighbours, a
Scottish identity will always be linked to the English and Irish
identities, and independence cannot change that. The Home Nations (in
the inclusive Rugby sense, that includes the Republic of Ireland) will
always be a very powerful force, and will always constitute the major
part of the Scottish identity, either viewed as equal partners, as
trading nations, as an area of free migration, as nations united in
sporting passion or in our shared history. The political make-up
should never define your identity. When politics and nationalism get
mixed up, you get extremes that defend "Britain" at all costs and
those who defend their own patch at all costs. It won't take much for
Scottish nationalism to be dragged into the same, drawn out, bloody
resolution that has haunted Irish independence, but the sectarianism
that drives that does not have to be part of the Scottish identity,
any more than poor diets, low life expectancy or mass emigration.
Whether you support independence or not, have a think about what being
Scottish or being British means to you. What is your identity, and is
it the identity that you have chosen or is it an identity that has
been chosen for you? And if you're not sure what you think of the British identity, have a
read of the foreigners' view of Britain (
http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3312457 ) Be fair, and be tolerant. And above all else, be yourself.
by the recent SNP victory in Scotland, and I'm still trying to
crystallise my views on the subject, so I'm going to take a few posts
to talk about how I feel, to get away from the political and economic
arguments, and think about the more personal arguments, so please chip
in with your thoughts. Today's post is inspired by David Mitchell mourning Britain and
discussing British Identity in the context of independence winning out
in a referendum (
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/15/david-mitchell-scotland-s...
). I know a lot of people I know on Facebook and Twitter feel the same
way, but I don't. I have Scottish parents, and 3 of my 4 grandparents
were born in Scotland. The other, having been born in Berwick Upon
Tweed, would give me entitlement to an English passport after
secession, but was unlikely to admit it. I was, however, born and raised in England, and my accent makes this
clear, but I always spent time visiting my extended family in
Scotland, read The Beano and The Sunday Post (Oor Wullie meant that,
years later, I found nothing difficult in the language of
Trainspotting), and I always supported the Scottish Rugby team, but
also supported Nigel Mansell and Richard Noble. My heroes include
James Watt, but also Alan Turing and Albert Einstein. I did feel that
when I moved to Edinburgh for university however, it did feel like a
homecoming, but then I must admit that I never quite felt like I
fitted in, in England, or in Scotlad. I never felt excluded, more like
a welcome traveller passing through. Partly because of these
allegiances and partly from a conscious decision that I always wanted
to keep my options open, looking out rather than in. So, my identity has always included Scottishness, but it also includes
Britishness, bound in the concepts of fair play, tolerance and
inclusiveness, and a European identity forged from Human Rights and
freedom that extends across borders. I am, too, a geek, a musician, an
athiest, a husband, a son, a brother, and in many other ways, part of
a family. I have many identities, and the legal status of this land at
one end of this group of islands will not change that. An independent
Scotland will not destroy Britain, or a British identity, but it will
further define it as a unique identity apart from an English identity.
The English identity, like the Scottish, Irish, and many other
national identities, is a tribal one, where different regions maintain
a separate identity but also share a common one. The conflict of the
English identity is that it is bound so tightly to the British
identity (and formally the Imperial identity), that it can be hard to
separate them. This is not a problem for Scotland, and this is not a problem for
Britain, it is not even a problem for England, despite fears to the
contrary. England will still be the home for the commonwealth head of
state, who will also remain Scotland's head of state according to the
SNP's proposal. England will still unite behind one football team, one
rugby team and one cricket team, but will also be a nation whose
people support other teams, permanently or temporarily. It is a
multi-cultural, globalised nation, at its best when it looks out to
the world with eyes that care about tolerance and fairness, those
British eyes that have readily embraced Indian cuisine, Japanese car
makers, American culture, and the best things from around the world. So where does this leave Scottish identity? Scottish identity cannot
be separated from a British identity, or a Celtic identity
(particularly in the West), a Viking identity (particularly in the
North East), or a European identity. It is also impossible to define
the modern Scottish identity without talking about the neighbours, a
Scottish identity will always be linked to the English and Irish
identities, and independence cannot change that. The Home Nations (in
the inclusive Rugby sense, that includes the Republic of Ireland) will
always be a very powerful force, and will always constitute the major
part of the Scottish identity, either viewed as equal partners, as
trading nations, as an area of free migration, as nations united in
sporting passion or in our shared history. The political make-up
should never define your identity. When politics and nationalism get
mixed up, you get extremes that defend "Britain" at all costs and
those who defend their own patch at all costs. It won't take much for
Scottish nationalism to be dragged into the same, drawn out, bloody
resolution that has haunted Irish independence, but the sectarianism
that drives that does not have to be part of the Scottish identity,
any more than poor diets, low life expectancy or mass emigration.
Whether you support independence or not, have a think about what being
Scottish or being British means to you. What is your identity, and is
it the identity that you have chosen or is it an identity that has
been chosen for you? And if you're not sure what you think of the British identity, have a
read of the foreigners' view of Britain (
http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3312457 ) Be fair, and be tolerant. And above all else, be yourself.
2 comments:
Seems to me that the only people having problems lately with identity issues are those who in the same article speak about multicuturism, diversity and being tolerant.
Your confusion lies in the ideology of diversity and multi culturism.
By trying to make something all inclusive (such as English identity) then it loses all ability to be an identity. Black, asian, oriental, Kebabs, Fish and Chips, Tortias, Shakespear, Tolstoy Elgar or Tchikovsky etc.
Then you take your non identity and hold it up against those true English and your bit of this and a bit of that identity shows the cracks that exist in it.
As long as we true English or those true Scots exist as a mirror of your Psuedo identity then you will always feel 'not quite part of the group'.
Identity is what is says;
AN IDENTITY.
An identity is something that is a TWO WAY STREET....
Not only must you consider yourself of that group but,
THE GROUP MUST ALSO ACCEPT YOU AS BEING A PART OF THEIR GROUP.
From your ancestry your a Scot with English identity.
The group may be fooled into thinking you English (until they find out your ancestry)because of your Englishness. But that is irrelevant because YOU KNOW inside that your a Scot. Thats why you dont feel as if you fit in in England or in Scotland.
Problem is when you go to Scotland your looked on as English because of your Englishness.
The confusion isnt in the group it is in your head.
You think identity lies in abstracts like Tolerance and fair play, as if walking down a road in Mexico someone would recognise you as British because you were tolerant!
I have no confusion with Englishness.
There are people who are not English.
There are people who are not English but have English identities, and
there are the English.
I will never be confused for a Scot or a Polish or Welsh.
I am English. :)
I have no confusion about my identity. I know who I am.
I understand your point about a two way street : if I made a claim to a Spanish identity, I don't think that would hold up, but we have to be careful about who defines these identities. Is the Scottish identity defined by the separatists or the unionists? Or can both viewpoints be considered Scottish?
Given the reaction to the world cup, can you have an English identity without football? The only person who can define your identity is you. If you let others define your identity, they will also start to define your humanity, or lack of, and down that path lies division and violence.
Post a Comment